Examining fragments of the quantified propositional calculus
نویسنده
چکیده
When restricted to proving Σqi formulas, the quantified propositional proof system Gi is closely related to the Σ b i theorems of Buss’s theory S i 2. Namely, G ∗ i has polynomial-size proofs of the translations of theorems of S 2, and S i 2 proves that G ∗ i is sound. However, little is known about Gi when proving more complex formulas. In this paper, we prove a witnessing theorem for Gi similar in style to the KPT witnessing theorem for T i 2 . This witnessing theorem is then used to show that S i 2 proves G ∗ i is sound with respect to Σqi+1 formulas. Note that unless the polynomial-time hierarchy collapses S 2 is the weakest theory in the S2 hierarchy for which this is true. The witnessing theorem is also used to show that G1 is p-equivalent to a quantified version of extended-Frege for prenex formulas. This is followed by a proof that Gi p-simulates G ∗ i+1. We finish by proving that S2 can be axiomatized by S 1 2 plus axioms stating that the cut-free version of G0 is sound. All together this shows that the connection between G ∗ i and S i 2 does not extend to more complex formulas. §
منابع مشابه
On Quantified Propositional Logics and the Exponential Time Hierarchy
We study quantified propositional logics from the complexity theoretic point of view. First we introduce alternating dependency quantified boolean formulae (ADQBF) which generalize both quantified and dependency quantified boolean formulae. We show that the truth evaluation for ADQBF is AEXPTIME(poly)-complete. We also identify fragments for which the problem is complete for the levels of the e...
متن کاملQuantified propositional calculi and fragments of bounded arithmetic
The motivation for this paper comes from a well-known and probably very difficult problem whether Bounded Arithmetic is fiIiitely axiomatizable. Attempts tosolve this problem using the machinery of mathematicallogic have failed so far. It is possible that, the problem can be solved by combining logic with combinatl;>rics. This would require a transformation onto a more combinatorial problem. Th...
متن کاملOn Propositional QBF Expansions and Q-Resolution
Over the years, proof systems for propositional satisfiability (SAT) have been extensively studied. Recently, proof systems for quantified Boolean formulas (QBFs) have also been gaining attention. Q-resolution is a calculus enabling producing proofs from DPLL-based QBF solvers. While DPLL has become a dominating technique for SAT, QBF has been tackled by other complementary and competitive appr...
متن کاملMonodic temporal logic with quantified propositional variables
We extend the monodic fragment of first-order linear temporal logic to include right-linear grammar operators and quantification of propositional variables. Unlike propositional temporal logic, the use of grammar operators in first-order temporal logic is not equivalent to general propositional quantification, as the latter admit satisfiable formulae without countable models. We consider the de...
متن کاملSimulating non-prenex cuts in quantified propositional calculus
We show that the quantified propositional proof systems Gi are polynomially equivalent to their restricted versions that require all cut formulas to be prenex Σqi (or prenex Πqi ). Previously this was known only for the treelike systems G ∗ i .
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- J. Symb. Log.
دوره 73 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008